<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discuss: Can THE DARK KNIGHT Beat TITANIC for the Box Office King of All Time??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ramascreen.com/discuss-can-the-dark-knight-beat-titanic-for-the-box-office-king-of-all-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ramascreen.com/discuss-can-the-dark-knight-beat-titanic-for-the-box-office-king-of-all-time/</link>
	<description>Your Kick-Ass Movie Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:08:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: download movie titanic</title>
		<link>http://ramascreen.com/discuss-can-the-dark-knight-beat-titanic-for-the-box-office-king-of-all-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2405</link>
		<dc:creator>download movie titanic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ramasscreen.com/2008/08/03/discuss-can-the-dark-knight-beat-titanic-for-the-box-office-king-of-all-time/#comment-2405</guid>
		<description>All-Time USA Box office;
1. Titanic (1997) 	- $600,779,824
2. The Dark Knight (2008) - $527,822,235
3. Star Wars (1977) - $460,935,665

Source: IMDB

Figures are NOT adjusted for inflation.

When adjusting Titanic&#039;s figure for inflation however (using 2007 adjustment instead of 2008) and it tops TDK big-time. HOWEVER, enter Star Wars, 1977 and check this inflation-adjustment:

1. Star Wars (1977) - $1,560,255,123.81
2. Titanic (1997) - $773,402,761.70
3. The Dark Knight (2008) - $527,822,235

So let&#039;s just call it a day and forget about the Titanic vs. TDK argument :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All-Time USA Box office;<br />
1. Titanic (1997) 	- $600,779,824<br />
2. The Dark Knight (2008) &#8211; $527,822,235<br />
3. Star Wars (1977) &#8211; $460,935,665</p>
<p>Source: IMDB</p>
<p>Figures are NOT adjusted for inflation.</p>
<p>When adjusting Titanic&#8217;s figure for inflation however (using 2007 adjustment instead of 2008) and it tops TDK big-time. HOWEVER, enter Star Wars, 1977 and check this inflation-adjustment:</p>
<p>1. Star Wars (1977) &#8211; $1,560,255,123.81<br />
2. Titanic (1997) &#8211; $773,402,761.70<br />
3. The Dark Knight (2008) &#8211; $527,822,235</p>
<p>So let&#8217;s just call it a day and forget about the Titanic vs. TDK argument <img src='http://ramascreen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
